Quantcast
Channel: The performance of NAMD? - Matter Modeling Stack Exchange
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3

The performance of NAMD?

$
0
0

I'm interested in discussing the performance of the new version of NAMD. It seems that in this updated version, there's an increased reliance on GPU processing. However, despite using this new version, I haven't observed any notable improvements compared to the previous iteration.

Below are the submission codes and the average processing times for both versions:

NAMD_3.0b6_Linux-x86_64-multicore-CUDA/namd3 +p24 +idlepoll $NAMD_INPUT > $NAMD_OUTPUTAverage time = 93.65 ns/dayNAMD_3.0b3_Linux-x86_64-multicore-CUDA/namd3 +p24 +idlepoll $NAMD_INPUT > $NAMD_OUTPUTAverage time = 93.55 ns/day

I don't know if there is some wrong. What do you think?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>